Drug war continues, fueled by re-arrests and innovation

» 3 Comments | Post a Comment

Cocaine and alcohol were 44-year-old Maurice Graham’s ammunition for more than a decade.

He entered the drug war at a party where peer pressure led him to experiment at the age of 18. He left the fight more than a year ago with a criminal record longer than his age. Although he is out of prison for multiple burglary charges, he is expected to spend the next 44 years on parole.

“An addiction is just that. It could come up at any time.  It wasn’t always easy to change,” said Graham, who now serves as associate pastor of The Ordinary People Society (T.O.P.S.) Ministries in Dothan. “After going in and out of jail for 16 years, this time I was ready to change.”

President Barack Obama allotted $15.1 billion in Fiscal Year 2010 toward drug enforcement and prevention that would help people who were like Graham. Less is slated for prevention than last fiscal year, while most is to fund drug interdiction and investigation units.

But if statistics mark success, then Ozark Police Chief Tony Spivey said any additional money for the Wiregrass Violent Crimes/Drug Task Force can strengthen results and help people - after their arrests - enter rehabilitation programs by way of the justice system.

The increase in stats could also show a sign of a growing problem.

“We’ve gotten really good results over the past several years and our goal has been to get the dealers and then the suppliers, but the bad thing is when we make headway, dealers come up with some new innovation to keep a step ahead of us,” Spivey said.

“It’s a tough, tough road a lot of times because suppliers, especially this year, are out of Miami, Texas and Atlanta. You see a lot of marijuana, crack and cocaine come into this area.”

Spivey said the Wiregrass Violent Crimes/Drug Task Force initiated 719 drug investigations in Ozark in 2008 that resulted in 536 drug arrests and $253,020 in seizures of various types of drugs. Already this year, the department seized $543,765 in drugs and initiated 474 drug investigations, he said.

Intelligence from local community members was key in many of the arrests, Spivey said, though often the charges are against people who have been arrested before for the same crimes.

Nearly 35 percent of Alabama’s inmates who were released from prison in 2005 after serving a sentence for drug-related crimes have gone back to prison between 2005 and 2008, according to the Alabama Department of Corrections.

Newton Police Chief John Beistline said a bulk of his career has been spent re-arresting suspected drug violators for misdemeanor drug crimes.
“I have no pity for drug dealers, but if a person is a user and life doesn’t offer chances for employment or stability, then they go back to what they know and this cycle starts,” he said.

“They go to prison a few years, come back, then essentially go back to doing what they used to do. And it’s the families to dish out bail money and sit during court dates that suffer until the person has a change of heart.”

State and local programs handed down through the courts have sought to keep first-time offenders from being re-offenders, and in turn help curb drug arrests.

But those programs cost money, Dale County Special Programs Manager Cheryl Leatherwood said. Leatherwood is an official with drug court, which recently began in Dale and Geneva counties.

“ I was disappointed to see that President Obama did not follow through on his promise to stop the ‘War on Drugs.’  He did not increase funding for treatment interventions and working with the courts to identify those who can benefit from intervention programs,” she said.

“I know that drug court and the intensive judicial intervention is helping.  We have had graduates in the past couple of months and have many more slated for graduation over the summer ... .”

Leatherwood said regulations surrounding drug court are set up so that only people seeking a real change are allowed entry.

Sixteen of the 65 participants in Dale and Geneva counties were removed or terminated from the program, while four have graduated.
But it’s not the program that fails, Graham said. It’s people.

“In the prison system a lot of times I took rehab courses to get out and not to get help. The programs didn’t fail me, I failed them because they teach you that you have to want it. Now at T.O.P.S. I help other people know we’re not second-class citizens, we’re second-chance citizens,” Graham said. “I want to repay the community I helped destroy.”

Graham said T.O.P.S. offers education and reform programs to people who seek their help, as well as job preparation classes.

“We have computer education programs, G.E.D. courses, everything a lot of people need to get back on their feet,” he said.

“And we have God. For me, that was the only way change started.”

———————————————

President’s drug budget
The Administration’s plan for reducing drug use and availability is based around four major policy areas: (1) Substance abuse prevention, (2) Substance abuse treatment, (3) Domestic law enforcement; and (4) Interdiction and international counterdrug support. In Fiscal Year 2010, the President requests $15.1 billion in support of these key policy areas, which is an increase of $224.3 million, or 1.5 percent over the FY 2009 enacted level of $14.8 billion.
Breakdown:
Treatment—$3.6 billion
Prevention—$1.6 billion
Domestic Law Enforcement—$3.7 billion
Interdiction—$4 billion
International—$2.2 billion
Source: Office of National Drug Control Policy, http://www.whitehousedrugpolicy.gov

Drug offense court programs
Pre-Trial Diversion - First-time offenders are required to attend and complete the court referral program (substance abuse education/treatment) as part of the program. Upon completion of the requirements placed on them, their charges are dismissed.
Drug Court - Offenders are required to attend and complete substance abuse treatment, frequent drug testing, and weekly court appearance with the judge. Upon completion of the requirements placed on them, their charges are dismissed.
State Probation - Offenders are required to report to the probation officer and attend court referral program (substance abuse education/treatment) as a condition of probation or attend the Life Tech facilities to seek assistance for their issues. Those placed on probation have a conviction on their record.
Community Corrections - Non-violent offenders who would otherwise be sentenced to prison are allowed to stay at home and work to support their families while attending substance abuse treatment and other programs to aid them in becoming more productive citizens. Those placed in community corrections have a conviction on their record, in addition to a prison sentence.
Source: Dale County Community Corrections

Advertisement

 
View More: No tags are associated with this article
Not what you're looking for? Try our quick search:
 

Advertisement

Reader Reactions

Flag Comment Posted by caroleena on June 17, 2009 at 9:17 am

you are right. my 19 year old son was busted for possession of a small amount of weed. he was set up by the local junk yard dealer to fill his “quota” of ratting people off from a supposed “deal” with a guy on the violent crimes and drug task force. yes, possession is against the law. my son has multiple health issues and was already under treatment with mental health for problems he has had since birth. plus, he’s 19. he sure isn’t an exception to trying weed. his dad and i are disabled and he is our only help. he doesn’t work due to the health and mental issues. guess who gets to pay those freaking fines? which will amount to the tune of 2500-3000 bucks? how we will do it is beyond me. why not community service? something that will help people in this community? there are lots of things that he could do. instead you go, as you say, pay, pee, pay, pee. some rehab.
he really already knew how to pee. and i fail to see how the “friend” who set him up is allowed to transact business as usual. not just weed but pills and coke.( yes i told LE) he is the local provider of drugs to the kids on the east side of ozark. he had a party on NY where drugs and underage drinking were going on as well as sex acts with a 14 year old girl. we reported that said party was going down but as far as i know the law never even rode by.i’m sure it’d been hard to miss the bonfire and high kids. no my son wasn’t there but he was invited. i saw the 14 year old girl the next day and trust me- bad hangover. why not bust the dealer? cut off the head and the booty will die.

Flag Comment Posted by ohana1956 on June 14, 2009 at 6:46 am

This is a subject that is close to my heart and personal. 

CRO, IOP?  You have got to be kidding me.  These are not drug rehab programs set up to help addicts, they are merely a fund sucking front to obtain money from the state and federal government and from offenders.  They are a mere formality of the court system.  They were not set up to “help” or “rehabilitate” addicts, but rather punish them.

Let’s see… a young man, 22 years old, gets pulled over for having a headlight out on his vehicle, the officer searches him and finds 2 valiums in his pocket.  He tries to explain to the officer that his brother, who is dying of brain cancer, dropped them in the vehicle and he picked them up off the floorboard and placed them in his pocket to return them to him.  The officer doesn’t want to hear it.  He is arrested for Possession of a Controlled Substance and taken into custody.  He is assigned a public defender who is one of the Judge’s son.  The PD knows the fact in this case, but doesn’t bring up these issues to the Judge, even though the young man has the proof provided through Hospice in the form of a statement, as well as a statement from his brother.  The PD will also not ask the Judge if the young man’s mother can approach him.  This young, by the way, happens to be brain damaged from a frontal lobe lobectomy as a result of severe epilepsy.  The Judge sentences him to 2 years in the penitenary, which is suspended and places him on 3 years probation.  Automatically, he is to report to CRO.  I have yet to figure out what the heck this office does.  Each month he is to report, pay, and pee upon demand.  This doesn’t include him reporting to the probation officer who he also has to pay and pee on demand for or the court fines of over $5,000.00.  CRO wants him to go to IOP (Intensive Outpatient Program).  Again, you have to pay to attend this program which lasts 12 -18 weeks.  Keep in mind this is a 22 year old, with disabilities, who holds down a minimum wage job and doesn’t have a drug problem and is still paying off fines even after getting off of probation.  When he is finished paying this off, he’ll have paid approximately $10,000.00 for these 2 valiums.  Now… tell me this is geared to help rehabilitate addicts and dealers.  These programs are an insult to the taxpayers intelligence.  Had this young man been a drug user or dealer, he would have had no alternative than to be revoked and placed back in jail or to continue to sell drugs to pay this money to the system that is suppose to be rehabilitating him.  Furthermore, after investigating the CRO and IOP programs, it is a fact that not one of the “counselors” has any first hand experience or street smarts.  The only experience they have is from a book and a college degree.  They sit in their little groups surrounded by addicts, users and dealers who go through the motions just to stay out of jail.  Yet, we, the taxpayers fund this crap.  Did I mention that there is only one court related treatment facility?  Imagine that…

Flag Comment Posted by caroleena on June 13, 2009 at 9:22 pm

perhaps they should point their efforts to a certain local junkyard where a prolific amount of illegal drugs are sold to ozark’s youth

Post a Comment(Requires free registration)

The commenting period has ended or commenting has been deactivated for this article.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement