Case against Dothan High principal sealed

Case against Dothan High principal sealed
» 24 Comments | Post a Comment

The recent criminal charge filed against Dothan High School’s principal will go before a judge in a closed courtroom, when and if it goes to trial.

Carla Woodall, the Houston County Circuit Court clerk, said the recent criminal charge filed against Andrew Dwight Sewell will be tried in juvenile court, which makes the charge a sealed case.

Dothan police arrested Sewell, 41, on Thursday and charged him with misdemeanor contributing to the delinquency of a minor. Sewell, of Montrose Court, was released from custody at the Houston County Jail after he posted a $600 bond. According to a police statement, police have called the allegation part of an ongoing investigation, which could result in additional charges.

Dothan city school and police officials released information last week that said the allegation stemmed from an inappropriate relationship with a female student under the age of 18. Sewell has been principal of Dothan High for two years. Assistant Principal Matt Humphrey will take over Sewell’s duties for the time being.

“It’s the only charge against an adult that I know of that’s tried in juvenile court,” Woodall said.

Woodall said by law, as the clerk of court, she can not even confirm a case exists in juvenile court, including the Sewell case, but she said press releases were recently sent out by city officials.

Woodall said if the case against Sewell goes to trial, it would be held in a courtroom closed to the public, and not even the defendant’s family could attend unless agreed to by the parties. She said the Sewell case would be held in front of Circuit Court Judge Butch Binford as are other juvenile cases.

If convicted, Sewell faces up to a year of hard labor and up to a $500 fine. But Woodall said the court also has the option to suspend any sentence handed down, or remit the fine and sentence the defendant to probation.

Woodall said if convicted, the charge would not show up on a background check because the case would be sealed in juvenile court.

She said generally a contributing to the delinquency of a minor charge deals with alcohol or cigarette-related issues. But she said it can also deal with dating issues and relationships where the parents or guardian have told an adult not to see their child.

Derek Yarbrough, who has been retained to represent Sewell, said he’s not been made aware of any additional charges. Yarbrough also said he is not aware of an arraignment date in the case, which he said would be the next court date.

Advertisement

 
View More: No tags are associated with this article
Not what you're looking for? Try our quick search:
 

Advertisement

Reader Reactions

Flag Comment Posted by guru on March 10, 2009 at 5:13 pm

Thank goodness he wasn’t smoking pot. He’d still be in the clink. After all he WAS ONLY having sex with a student in his care. And it’s some real award winning investigative journalism. Either the reporter doesn’t know what went on - or the Eagle won’t print it.
Wait and see if Sewell has to register as a sex offender. I BET NOT. You heard it here first.

Flag Comment Posted by mrhunter on March 06, 2009 at 6:04 pm

Is this man getting special treatment?  Lets have a show of hands !

Flag Comment Posted by mrhunter on March 06, 2009 at 6:03 pm

Another thing i have noticed , the dothan eagle wont allow comments on most of the news concerning sewell. Is it my imagination or does it seem this man is getting some preferencial treatment?

Flag Comment Posted by mrhunter on March 06, 2009 at 6:01 pm

I noticed on this site today where another man in dothan was having sex with a 16 yr old girl and is being charged with felony rape. Wonder why sewell is only charged with a misdemeanor. Something about this entire situation smells worse then the bathroom door on a shrimpboat !!

Flag Comment Posted by mrhunter on March 05, 2009 at 7:39 am

Michael , it dont matter if he’s found innocent or guilty , he can still be charged in a civil suit. Naturally i wouldnt file one until i saw the outcome of these charges in juvenile court.
Your right the age of consent in Alabama is 16.It may be that the parents were aware of what was going on .I know if i was the parent you would be seeing my face on every newspaper and tv in the area.To me its not as much her age , rather his position that bears on this case.

Flag Comment Posted by southernmom on March 05, 2009 at 5:29 am

I’m sorry but I’m a teacher (not at that school)but I still find that this is wrong on so many different levels.. Why is he getting special treatment and not being tried in adult court? This means with no record of this he will be free to go out and do it again and again. With him being the principal he absolutely knew better than to have relations with a student.. Something has to be done and if Troy King was involved with an arrest with an Enterprise man regarding sex-related issues then he should especially be involved with this one.. I am thinking someone pulled some strings and that is why he is getting special treatment he does NOT deserve.. This is WRONG WRONG WRONG!!!!!

Flag Comment Posted by CC Dollar on March 04, 2009 at 10:57 pm

sewells done…don’t renew sam nichols contract and i’m a happy camper..give us a bonus and cancel the uniform policy they forced down our throats..

“we are going to hold the rules tight to our chest this year”...rotflmao sure sam..sure.

Flag Comment Posted by michaelthins on March 04, 2009 at 9:40 pm

Mr.Hunter, according to what was just released he was to have had sex with a person under 18. Law says under 16 is statutory rape. Just PO’s me he will get a slap on the wrist and allowed to go on.

Flag Comment Posted by michaelthins on March 04, 2009 at 8:29 pm

A civil suit at this time would be useless or premature. Only at the time and if he is found guilty would this be supportive thereof. I would wonder though as to the charge in civil ligitation you or I could be other than child endangerment.
You know with this now in juvey, I think everyone should be charged with child endangerment or some charge therein. Giving that now the they have flawed the law by not giving this man an adult charge. If some one is charged with a similiar charge and is tried in adult court they could bring up this very case that they were not given equal protection of the very law this man will be tried. With this I am talking U.S. Constitutional Law and a subsquent rapist or something in this type of scenerio could possibly walk scott free with a good attorney.

Flag Comment Posted by mrhunter on March 04, 2009 at 8:15 pm

Michael , i thought about the double jeopardy earlier today but i didnt know if that would apply. I guess the only other alternative is a possible civil lawsuit. Valeska wont have any say so about that. This entire situation stinks . Something’s not right and i cant figure out what it is.I personally would look into filing a civil suit against this man as well as dothan city schools.If the school board sees they can be brought into this then they might not be so willing to protect him .I do believe the parents could push hard enough and something would change.

Post a Comment(Requires free registration)

The commenting period has ended or commenting has been deactivated for this article.
 

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement