Not guilty verdict reached in AMX theft case

» 5 Comments | Post a Comment

Matt Ludlam rushed into his family’s arms and enjoyed a long embrace Wednesday morning, moments after a Houston County jury found him not guilty of two counts of first degree theft.

Ludlam’s attorney said the verdict provided vindication and some solace for a man he said was inadvertently caught up in a scam created by his brother, who is awaiting trial on theft charges.

“What you had here was one brother trusting his older brother,” said Joey Sheffield, Matt Ludlam’s attorney. “And in the end, it was (Matt) just doing his job that ended up getting his brother caught.”

Matt Ludlam, who had been an employee at AMX trucking in Ashford since 2001, was reassigned to a job that his brother, Billy, had for years. Billy Ludlam left AMX in December of 2007 for another job. Billy Ludlam has been indicted on charges that he, while running what is known as the “shop” at AMX, conjured a fictitious tire company and then generated fake work orders for work done on the company’s trucks while they were out on the road. The checks cut by AMX to the business known as “National Tire Company” wound up back in Billy Ludlam’s possession and were deposited into a bank account in his name, authorities have said. Prosecutors believe the scheme had gone undetected for almost 10 years and cost the company more than $2 million.

Not long after Matt Ludlam was reassigned, one of the National Tire Company checks was sent to an invalid address and returned to the company, raising a red flag with other employees. When AMX management looked into the company, they discovered it did not exist.

Matt Ludlam signed off on seven of the National Tire Company work orders, resulting in two checks being written to the company, one for about $14,000 and the other for about $11,000. Soon after the first check was written, Billy Ludlam wrote a check to Matt Ludlam for more than $2,000 out of an account in the name of Billy Ludlam and National Tire Company. Matt said he never noticed the name on the check and that Billy often provided financial assistance to the family.

Matt Ludlam said he trusted the authenticity of the account for the same reason other AMX employees did — they trusted Billy.

“Everybody at AMX trusted Billy,” Sheffield said.

Matt Ludlam declined comment.

Advertisement

 
View More: No tags are associated with this article
Not what you're looking for? Try our quick search:
 

Advertisement

Reader Reactions

Flag Comment Posted by Mike Keevert on March 03, 2009 at 4:35 pm

I met Matt when I worked at AMX several years ago and thought he was one of the “good guys”.  This verdict doesn’t surprise me a bit.  Good luck Matt, I hope you and your family can put this behind you and move on.  I wonder if AMX has offered him his job back?  From what I remember about the management I really doubt it.

Flag Comment Posted by tonyaal on February 26, 2009 at 3:33 pm

I am happy for Matt & his family.  I agree with his wife. He is a nice person. I am glad the outcome is a good one. For once the law has worked in favor of the innocent.

Flag Comment Posted by Loving Wife on February 25, 2009 at 3:35 pm

Regardless of what anyone thinks or feels about the outcome of my husbands case it is done. There are not many people who would recieve a check from a family member and go over it with a fine tooth comb before excepting it. Matt was simply doing his job. My husband is a wonderful man and a great father and would never do anything to intentionally hurt anyone. He is the most caring person that I know. Anyone that knows Matt and our family has known the whole time that this was crazy. We appreciate all the love and support that everyone has given us during all of this. Thanks for standing by us - it means the world.

Flag Comment Posted by mrhunter on February 25, 2009 at 2:57 pm

Well according to the jury hes innocent but had i been on the jury i would have seriously questioned his explaination on the 2000 dollar check. I know i look at checks when someone gives me one.

Flag Comment Posted by dalecountymom on February 25, 2009 at 1:07 pm

Matt should not HAVE to make any comment.  He probably feels bad enough without the eyes of the world being on him. After all, he trusted his brother.

Although I do not have any right to judge, betrayal from anyone, especially family, hurts. Having to deal with this in public is probably hard enough without everybody looking at him and talking.

Post a Comment(Requires free registration)

The commenting period has ended or commenting has been deactivated for this article.
 

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement