Educators urging passage of Amendment One to stave off cuts
Jay Hare /
Deshun Campbell, left, and Larry Thompson work on math problems inside the science lab at Beverlye Middle School on Tuesday afternoon.
Educators say Alabamians can prevent funding cuts and teacher layoffs by voting for an amendment that would allow schools to tap a state rainy day fund.
On the ballot in November is a constitutional amendment that, if proration is declared, would allow the state’s schools to borrow money from about $3 billion in oil and gas royalties the state holds in trust. Amendment One would allow the schools to borrow about $435 million from the trust fund.
State education officials say the amendment is necessary because tax revenues have fallen sharply and proration, an across-the-board emergency cut in government funding, is all but a certainty.
Alabama has made strides in education in recent years. The state’s fourth graders led the nation in standardized reading scores, Alabama fourth and eighth graders improved at twice the national average in math last year and an increasing number of state schools are meeting federal No Child Left Behind Act goals.
Much of the credit for this success is being given to programs like the Alabama Reading Initiative and the Alabama Math, Science and Technology Initiative. These programs could be cut, and all of the progress the state has made wiped away if proration is declared and education funding reduced.
“Instability is not good,” said Michael Sibley, an Alabama Department of Education spokesman. “You don’t want teachers in a position where they have to worry if they have a job next year.”
In Dothan, the city school system could be forced to cut about $1.5 million from its budget if proration is declared and the system can’t draw on state rainy day funds.
Dothan City School Superintendent Sam Nichols said Amendment One would create a safety net for schools, but with a cost because the funds would have to be paid back. This means future revenue growth that could be applied to new programs would be used to refund the trust fund.
“It’s a double-edged sword,” Nichols said. “You’re danged if you do and danged if you don’t.”
Advertisement
Reader Reactions
I WOULD LIKE TO SEE SOMEBODY SHOW ME ONE SCHOOL SYSTEM EMPLOYEES INSURANCE THAT IS NOT TAXPAYER SUBSIDIZED. NOBODY CAN
Ralt: thats not even the issue here in the article. We have lower insurance premiums b/c we are part of a union…
I PAY MORE FOR INSURANCE IN ONE WEEK THAN SCHOOL TEACHERS PAY IN A MONTH THEREFORE IT WILL BE A PLEASURE TU VOTE THIS DOWN
TO (Frog): It has to be paid back by law. None of it will go for teacher raises. If it passes, it will mean no raises while the fund being is paid back. This is for basic operation of schools. Come teach for one week and you will see that we are under paid for such a demanding PROFESSIONAL, ACCOUNTABLE JOB!
435 million dollars is alot of money to be borrowing AND to have to be PAID BACK. In the end, it probably won’t be paid back. How much of this will be for teacher raises? It seems they get their pay one way or the other. Hopefully the voters will think twice (real hard) before voting for this.


News editor Christie Kulavich guides you to fun events happening in the Wiregrass.
Sports writer Drew Champlin writes about the latest sports news from Troy University.
Reporters Lance Griffin and Debbie Ingram write about latest news released on the country music development planned for Houston County.

Advertisement