Army report: Fort Rucker MPs in Samson after shooting a violation

» 13 Comments | Post a Comment

The decision to send armed military policemen from Fort Rucker in response to the mass murders in Samson on March 10 was a violation of federal law, an Army investigation concluded.

According to records released to the Dothan Eagle on Monday, in response to a Freedom of Information request, the Department of Army Inspector General found that the armed troops in Samson violated the Posse Comitatus Act, which restrains the use of the military for civilian law enforcement purposes.

“... The historic tradition of limiting direct military involvement in civilian law enforcement activities, and the requirement of applicable law, do not appear to have been analyzed or considered. The intent was to be a good Army neighbor and help civilian law authorities facing a difficult, unique tragedy affecting the local community,” stated the Inspector General report, dated Aug. 10.

All names involved in the incident were redacted from the report.

The Inspector General report listed several recommendations in response to the violation, including: (1) Making a record of the allegation (2) Informing the Vice Chief of Staff of the Army of the finding and (3) Refer the report to the Office of the Judge Advocate General. The report did not state if anyone was disciplined.

According to the report, the troops responded to the situation in Samson based on a request from the Geneva County Sheriff’s Department and Samson Police Department. The report went on to say that although the troops were only on hand to support current law enforcement by manning traffic control points, the actions violated several “tests” used to determine whether a violation occurred.

“The first test was whether the actions of military personnel were active or passive ... the participating MPs did not view manning TCPs (traffic control points) as a law enforcement activity. The evidence indicated otherwise. By directing and diverting traffic and people, and by their uniformed and armed presence in the streets at TCPs, the MPs actively participated in law enforcement activities.”

The report also stated the actions constituted a violation because the MPs were not accompanied by civilian law enforcement at at least one of the traffic control points. Finally, the stated actions were a violation because the MPs “regulated the freedom of movement of civilian persons which served to prohibit those persons from going to where they might desire to go.”

The report states the officer who made the decision to send the MPs to Samson took full responsibility for his actions. He said he believed he had the authority based on his previous experience with military responses to Hurricanes Katrina and Andrew. However, the report stated the appropriate person to make the decision in this instance was the Secretary of Defense.

The incident that prompted the response occurred on the afternoon of March 10 when Michael McLendon drove into Samson and killed several residents downtown. McLendon eventually moved on to Geneva, where he killed himself at a local business. He killed 11 people, including himself.

Advertisement

 
View More: No tags are associated with this article
Not what you're looking for? Try our quick search:
 

Advertisement

Reader Reactions

Flag Comment Posted by marlena21 on November 01, 2009 at 6:17 am

Thank god for people who take responsibility and go ahead and do the right thing.  Contrast this with who we have to thank for the lawyers who then go after them…

Best regards,
buy viagra

Flag Comment Posted by cowboy on October 25, 2009 at 9:45 am

it seems to me people would be happy for the help all who posted comments didnt seem to see the side that is was a matter that local law was unable to do much about it some people have nothing beter to do but find something to gripe about maybe some people dont know when they have something to be thankful for

Flag Comment Posted by BMOC on October 24, 2009 at 3:52 pm

There is a big difference between what happened in Samson and the assistance Ft Rucker provided in E’prise.  In Samson, the MP’s were armed and were by themselves directing civilians.  Therein lies the problem.  The US military has absolutely no business directing US civilians to do anything.  It is against federal law.  The assistance they provided in Enterprise was not the same and did not violate any laws.  I served in the Army and worked at Ft Rucker as a civilian, my wife does now.  I know the importance of Ft Rucker to the wiregrass.  I have nothing but respect for the men and women in uniform…as long as they obey the law.

Flag Comment Posted by curtisrowe on October 24, 2009 at 3:13 pm

Jim Crowe…I agree with you on the comments you posted about the beauty pageants but I am glad that Fort Rucker is close and responded to the situation…it could have been a heck of a lot worse.  When a tornado knocked down a good part of EHS I was happy to see men in green helping out…

Flag Comment Posted by Jim Crow on October 23, 2009 at 9:17 pm

What are laws for?  You don’t get to pick and choose which ones you are going to obey.  If you choose to violate the law, NO MATTER THE REASON, then you can expect to pay a price.  The Posse Comitatus Act is there for a very good reason, we do not need to change it one little bit.  Patriotgyrl I thought you were leaving this area?  I offered to help you pack before and the offer still atands.

Flag Comment Posted by anon2 on October 22, 2009 at 7:11 am

Amen, stormin’. While it’s unfortunate that small town law enforcement agencies are not resourced for dealing with situations like this, that’s what the Sheriff’s Dept and National Guard (operating under Title 32 US Code) is for. The MPs in this situation had no more authority than Otis the town drunk, nor should they. The Posse Comitatus Act is there to protect your liberties, and the people who are so quick to discount it for convenience sake are the same ones who have silently allowed our constitutional rights to be eroded during nearly 30 years over a phony “War on Drugs” and “War on Terror”.

Flag Comment Posted by patriot.gyrl65 on October 21, 2009 at 3:28 pm

Well, I guess stormin’ and Bilal642, that maybe we should get this mans court martial started then, eh?  Just kick him right the heck out the Army.  We don’t need men like him in the military…what a scoundrel he was for helping a local community.
I just hope the next time something happens and the local yocal “cops” are overwhelmed, no one bothers those folks over at Ft Rucker…they got better things to do than protect and serve their community.  You know, like protecting and serving Afghanistan and Iraq…the really important places.

Flag Comment Posted by stormin on October 21, 2009 at 9:42 am

You people need to wake up and get your heads out of your posterior.

Either we have a Constitution and a Republic based on the rule of law or we do not.

Prosecute the offenders.

If you are afraid of some guy running around shooting people.  Then arm yourselves!

Flag Comment Posted by Bilal642 on October 21, 2009 at 9:14 am

WHat you may not know is that the person taking responisbility has blured the line before in regards to extending his authority outside the gates of Ft. Rucker. granted the act and intent was noble. But the logic was flawed and stupid. Many people scream about the constitution but are far to willing to set it aside for the so called greater good. Don’t let emotions be your guide. He knew the law and choose to violate it. Period.

Flag Comment Posted by patriot.gyrl65 on October 20, 2009 at 2:50 pm

To the military personnel who helped Samson and Geneva’s residents during this horrible crisis, THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU.
I hope that the person who authorized this action doesn’t suffer for his decision to aid his fellow citizens when they needed it and not when the military brass and red tape said it was alright to do so.  I think this person should maybe be promoted to head of FEMA.

Post a Comment(Requires free registration)

The commenting period has ended or commenting has been deactivated for this article.
 

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement