Craig says sign ordinance violations should be ‘overlooked’

Craig says sign ordinance violations should be ‘overlooked’

Jay Hare /

Political signs at the intersection of Brannon Stand Road and Flowers Chapel Road are shown Tuesday. Dothan City Commissioner John Craig wants to relax the rules pertaining to political sign on roadways.

» 4 Comments | Post a Comment

In an election year, campaign signs tend to draw a lot of attention, and not just as a means of getting a candidate’s name out there. Oftentimes, sign placement and size break city laws.

The only two Dothan city commissioners not running for office this year favor waiving the sign ordinance. Commissioner John Craig said the process of collecting the signs by two Dothan police officers is a poor utilization of taxpayer funds.

“I’d like to see us waive the sign ordinance,” Craig said Tuesday. “I think it is something we should overlook and get on with the business of the city.

“It is a waste of resources, gasoline, automobiles, and officers’ time. They’ve got better things to do than chase down signs.”

Last week, Mayor Pat Thomas sent a press release out reminding candidates of the ordinance.

Campaign signs in residential zones must be smaller than six square feet unless a permit is obtained. Political signs are required to be behind the right-of-way, and 10 to 12 feet from the edge of the roadway on city streets.

No signs may be placed on utility poles or in state or federal rights-of-way.

Commissioner Amos Newsome said politicians should not be hindered.

“I think we need to recognize that the City of Dothan belongs to the people, to the public. Those campaigning should be asking the people, the public.

“We should not hamper with those advertising for public service if it does not interfere with the safety of the city,” Newsome said.

The police department has two nuisance officers who handle complaints about such issues. Police Chief John Powell said residents may report violators through Q-Alert at http://www.dothan.org. Click on Customer Service and fill out a citizen form.

Powell said the officers get their information from the site and go out to assess the violation. If the violation is a sign, they pull it up and bring it to the police department. Signs are held for about a week before they are thrown away.

Powell said he does not consider any of the candidates lawbreakers.

“Helpers have the best intention in the world and they may not know they are breaking the law. Most of the candidates are extremely cooperative. They come get the signs and are very apologetic.”

The ordinances were drafted, Powell said, to protect the motoring public. Signs can block visibility and may be considered clutter on the roadways.

No one responded to Craig’s idea of waiving the ordinance, including Mayor Pat Thomas, who is not seeking a second term.

“I think it died,” Craig said. “All I wanted to do was get the word out that maybe people will stop complaining about it.

“The way I look at it, if there is a sign in the yard, you can throw it away. I have been fussing with the city manager about this waste of time to pick them up. We have better things our police officers can do.”

City elections are July 14. Sitting commissioners Larry Matthews, Paul Lee and Taylor Barbaree are up for re-election. Commissioner Keith Seagle is running for mayor.

Advertisement

 
View More: No tags are associated with this article
Not what you're looking for? Try our quick search:
 

Advertisement

Reader Reactions

Flag Comment Posted by Dave on May 20, 2009 at 3:27 pm

To make a statement such as “I think it is something we should overlook and get on with the business of the city” in reference to enforcing City laws on signs is idiotic and could have only come from an idiot.  Surely Mr. Craig was misquoted.  Enforcing City Ordinances IS the business of the city.

These candidates, as well as the commissioners, are Servants of the people and the people voted them in office with their trust.  The Sign Ordinance must have been needed or it would not have been passed.  If there’s anytime we need it, it is during these campaigns because the city looks awful.  I think they (people that are running for office) just love to see their name on those signs at every intersection.  They probably bring friends and relatives in from all over the country just to drive them around and show off their names.

Sorry for speaking so boldly, I’m just a common resident of Dothan (57years) and probably don’t have the same rights as the commissioners, mayor, or city manager.  I apologize for not knowing my place.

Dave

Flag Comment Posted by Speedy on May 20, 2009 at 6:19 am

Not so many years ago, a Dothan City Commissioner lost his seat after suggesting to the police chief that the police department practice selective law enforcement. I say out with these two idiots too, since they are basically saying they are above the law that is on the books.
Better yet, completely outlaw those damn political signs. They serve no real purpose, they are TACKY, and they tell me NOTHING I need to know to decide who I am going to vote for. Spend the sign money instead on direct mail pamphlets, outlining the candidate’s goals and experience. At least I might actually learn something about a candidate that way, other than that they have more signs than the next candidate. WOOHOO, lets vote for candidate X because he has the most signs.

Flag Comment Posted by michaelthins on May 19, 2009 at 8:10 pm

It sounds as if because a person is a politician in the Dity of Dothan then they shouldn’t have to follow the very laws they create. Hogwash!!!!!
If the sign oridance is let loose then a sign big enough to stop a person from seeing a stop sign or other type of safety sign maybe covered up, what happens if someone runs one of these signs some one is killed or maimed then would the politician be held liable. That is why the sign ordiance is needed. Besides it is agaisnt the state and federal law to advertise on a right of way. The city ordiance mirrors those laws for a reason.
No one is above the law I have long said if a person running for public office should show respect for the very laws they create. If the two councilman would remeber the very oath of office they took to uphold the laws of the City of Dothan, State of Alabama and the Federal laws. Sirs if you cannot or you want to snub those very laws then you should not be in office. It is your job for which you asked for to uphold the very laws that you request to “let politician not follow the sign ordiance,“ SHAME SHAME SHAME on both of you. If you allow this then you should be recalled or impeached.
As for the police picking up the signs I thik each and every sign that is in violation of the sign ordiance the candiate should be held accountable. One will say that no because the candiate giving signs to people cannot be held responsible for the laws that others break. However it is up to each candiate to instruct those placing signs of these laws.

Flag Comment Posted by Mountain Boy on May 19, 2009 at 6:02 pm

What part of the law does not apply. Hey I only steal 5 bucks from a business. Why don’t you waive that?  We have now reached the point where hey Mikey runs a big auto dealership and wants to run the the town. So no problem right?  Hey the Dothan High Principal says OK to consenual sex with a student. Why not waive that?  Hey the Honsuckle Middle School principle hides her Meth. Why can’t we waive that?  I recall the old Uniform Code of Military Justice rules that I had to comply with when I was in the US Navy. “Penetration however slight was suffecient to complete the act” If it is law then OBEY. If not then change the law.

Post a Comment(Requires free registration)

The commenting period has ended or commenting has been deactivated for this article.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement